Leakage fixes must stay, riskiest most expensive scheme must go: it’s time to axe the Abingdon Mega-reservoir

As reported in The Guardian, Thames Water’s new creditor consortium says infrastructure projects must be cut back to make the company viable again. £20.5bn of consumers’ money will be used to prioritise “core activities”—but deliver fewer projects.

This surely signals the end of the Abingdon Mega-reservoir?

How can a credible recovery plan champion the riskiest, most expensive scheme in the portfolio—one that hasn’t even proven to be feasible? With flood modelling, dam breach analysis, and emergency drawdown still missing.

We await the publication of Thames Water’s full investment plan next week, looking to see a sensible conclusion. That the Abingdon mega-reservoir, a high cost £7. 5 billion gamble, fails to meet the priorities needed to restore resilience, credibility, and public trust. It is time to pull the plug on the Abingdon mega-reservoir.

Past Articles

Discover more from Group Against Reservoir Development

Subscribe now to keep reading and get access to the full archive.

Continue reading